Services — clubs, agencies, media

Football data work,
scoped and priced.

Two kinds of client, one standard. Clubs and agencies come with a recruitment question and get an answer they can act on. Editors and brands come with a story and get the analysis, the writing and the graphics to tell it. Either way: a defined piece of work, a fixed price, and the method visible.

Introductory rates

I'm taking on my first paid clients, so the prices below are set lower than they will be. In return I ask for two things: honest feedback at the end, and permission to mention that we worked together (details stay confidential unless you agree otherwise).

Recruitment & transfer analysis

Each one below is a process I've already run and published in full. Follow the links — the free version is the specification for the paid one.

How the data works

Projects run on the data you already license — Wyscout, Opta, StatsPerform, or your own tracking feed. What you get depends on what you need: a finished report your staff can read and act on, or the full pipeline behind it (profiling, modelling and visual output) set up in your environment and documented so your analysts can rerun it. If you don't hold a licence, we scope to competitions with legitimately available data and I'll tell you exactly what that covers before you commit.

Second opinion

€350 1 week

You have a target and you've decided he's the one. Before the money moves, I stress-test him: role fit for how your team actually plays, whether his output is sustainable or noise, and adaptation risk from his league to yours. One player, one verdict, no hedging.

You get

  • A 4–6 page written verdict, conclusion first
  • The risk flags that would change that verdict
  • Follow-up questions answered in writing

If you want alternatives to him, that's a different job — see the shortlist brief below.

Already done

Immobile to Bologna — a single signing, a clear verdict, the squad-context reasoning behind it.

The same calls graded a season later — eighteen verdicts checked against what happened, misses included.

Shortlist brief

€1,200 2–3 weeks

The full commission for one position. We define the profile together, then I filter across the leagues your budget and style actually reach — weighted by how well transfers from each league have worked — cluster candidates into data-defined roles, rank them on what matters for that role, and land on a recommendation with every step exposed.

You get

  • Ranked shortlist of 5–8 names
  • Full profile pages for the top three
  • Methodology appendix your analysts can audit
  • Presentation to your recruitment staff

Already done

Finding Juventus' missing midfielder — the identical process, start to finish, on a squad I don't work for.

Which leagues actually produce successful transfers? — the research behind which markets make the filter.

Editorial & visualisation

I write The Cutback and make data graphics for a living. For publishers, that means one person who can find the story in the data, write it, and draw it — in your house style, on your deadline.

How the data works

Commissioned work runs on data you already license — Opta, Wyscout, StatsPerform, or a feed your group holds — or on sources that are explicitly free to publish. We fix the source and the credit line in the scope before anything starts, so nothing goes out with rights neither of us can stand behind. If you don't hold a licence, I'll tell you what can be covered cleanly before you commission the piece.

Commissioned analysis piece

from €150 1–2 weeks

A data-led feature on a player, a team, a trend or a transfer — researched, written and illustrated. You get a finished piece ready for your editor, not a spreadsheet and a paragraph.

You get

  • 1,500–2,500 words, in English or Italian
  • 4–6 original graphics in your house style
  • One round of edits, and sourcing notes for fact-checking

Good fit for

Football sites and magazines, club media and fan publications, betting and fantasy content teams.

Graphics package

€250 / 5 graphics 5 working days

You have the story, you need the visuals. Match graphics, player comparisons, season reviews or social-ready cards, designed to read at a glance and built on a reproducible template so the next batch comes faster.

You get

  • Five finished graphics, web and social sizes
  • Source files, and the template on request
  • A short note on what each graphic shows

Already done

Recent visuals, just below — passing networks, heatmaps, model outputs and tables, in different house styles.

No surprises, either direction

Scoping call

Thirty minutes, free. You describe the question or the story. I tell you whether the data can answer it — including when it can't.

Written scope

Deliverable, timeline and price, fixed in writing before anything starts. 50% up front.

Mid-point check

A review or first draft while there's still time to redirect. Nothing lands as a surprise at the end.

Handover

Final report, piece or files delivered, with the method written down so every conclusion can be checked.

The questions I'd ask too

Recruitment work

Have you worked inside a club?

No. Which is why I publish the method instead of asserting the experience.

The recruitment work is entirely my own: six seasons of publicly available event data turned into corridor models, role clustering, custom metrics, complete mock commissions — and a public audit of my own transfer calls a season on, misses included. All of it at The Cutback, with the method open.

What my client work gives me is production discipline: visual and editorial output delivered on deadline, at scale, for audiences that notice mistakes. The two streams don't share data. They share standards.

You can judge the quality of both before paying for a minute of it. Very few people you could hire will offer you that.

Whose data do we use?

Yours. Clubs and agencies already licence a feed that covers the players they'd realistically sign, and I work inside it. Published work on The Cutback runs on publicly available data — which means a paid project has deeper coverage than anything you can read for free.

What if the data can't answer the question?

Then I say so on the scoping call, before you've spent anything. Event data is very good at some questions and poor at others — defenders and goalkeepers remain genuinely hard, and I'd rather tell you that up front than deliver a confident answer built on thin evidence.

Do you take retainers?

After a first project, yes — around €900 a month for ongoing shortlist and analysis support through a window. Better for both of us to start with something scoped.

Editorial work

Can you work in our house style?

Yes. Send your style guide, fonts and colour palette, or a few published pieces, and graphics and copy follow them. If you don't have a guide, I'll propose one and keep it consistent.

Who owns the finished work?

Usage rights are agreed in the written scope. By default you get the right to publish the piece and graphics in the agreed outlets; exclusive or unlimited rights are available and priced in.

Where does the data for published work come from?

From a source we agree before starting, with a credit line if it needs one. Your licence is the first option; where you don't have one, I work from sources that are explicitly free to publish and tell you up front what that covers. Nothing gets published on data neither of us has the right to use.

Either way

How fast can you start?

I work as a freelance analyst with existing commitments, so I take a limited number of projects at a time and quote timelines I can actually hold. If the window is tight, say so on the call and I'll tell you honestly whether it fits.

Do you work in English?

Yes. Italian native, English professional, written and spoken.