Most transfers that fail, fail before anyone judges the player. He never wins his place.

I check whether a signing is likely to hold up in your league, and I tell you where the data can't see. Everything I'd build for you, I've already built in public.

Editors and brands: analysis pieces and graphics.

13,765 completed moves in 18 leagues since 2020/21, judged on the first season after the move. Re-run on my rebuilt pipeline, November 2026. Of the moves that didn't work, six in ten failed on minutes, not on talent.

What a Second opinion looks like

One player, six questions, one verdict. This is what you get, in the order you get it.

  1. The role he actually plays

    Position labels lie. I group players by where and how they act on the ball, so he's compared with players who do his job, not with everyone who wears his number.

  2. How good he is in that role

    His profile against every regular in his role and league, from chances and shooting to link play, carrying and defending. Then my finishing and passing models, which separate skill from luck, and how he's trended over his recent seasons. Where he stands out, and where he doesn't.

  3. How his move has gone for others

    Every league move has a track record. For strikers leaving the Championship, 45% of 240 held their level in their first season and 35% never won a regular place. That's the base rate: a prior, not a verdict on the player.

  4. What the data can't see

    Event data can't see runs in behind or how hard a striker presses. The report says plainly where the numbers stop, so you know what they leave open.

  5. What he should cost

    A fair price with a range, learned from what clubs actually paid for players like him. Price any player yourself in the price app.

  6. Sign, monitor or pass

    One word up front, a one-page answer behind it, then the detail if you want it, with the limits stated.

    Ask for a Second opinion, €200

What I can do for your club

One defined question, a fixed price, the method handed over with the answer. Each service is something I've already done in public: read the free version before you pay for any of it.

“We're close on a player. Is he good, and will he hold up in our league?”

Second opinion €200

A short report on one player: the role he actually plays, how good he is in it (his profile against his role in his league and in yours, finishing and passing models, his trend), the base rate for his move, his fair price, what the data can't see, and a sign / monitor / pass verdict.

Built on: which leagues produce successful transfers and the price model (try it).

“We need a player for this role and this budget.”

Shortlist brief €600

First, what your squad is actually short of, measured against teams that play like you. Then a target profile, candidates filtered and ranked for your league, fees and contracts checked. A one-page answer up front.

Built on: what Juventus are short of and finding their missing midfielder, the whole process done in public.

“We want this every window, not once.”

Retainer from €400 a month

An agreed number of reports or shortlist updates each month, scoped together. Offered after a first project, so we both know how the other works.

Which leagues

My models cover 18 leagues: the English top four, Serie A, La Liga, Bundesliga and 2. Bundesliga, Ligue 1, Eredivisie, Belgium, Portugal, Turkey, Russia, Scotland, MLS, Brazil and Argentina.

On paid work I run the same pipeline on the data you already license (Wyscout, StatsBomb or Opta). That covers any league, and academy football too.

What I'll tell you up front

  • Event data doesn't see runs in behind, pressing intensity or most of defending.
  • Transfermarkt values are estimates, not fees.
  • No development-prediction model: I don't forecast how a young player will grow.
  • The league-move base rates are league to league, not club by club.
  • No women's football data, yet.

Every method I use is published. So are the calls I got wrong.

I graded about 72 of my own transfer calls in public. More right than wrong, and the misses are in there too.

Jonathan David, whom I misprofiled. Højlund, Modrić, Grønbæk. I've never worked inside a club, so this is how you can check my judgement before hiring it.

Read “Was I Right?”

A price for every player

A model that prices players from real transfer fees, with a range, and shows how often the range was right (about 80% of fees land inside an 80% range). Free to use.

Open the price app

Which moves work

13,765 transfers judged against players who stayed, so a "success" means more than a good season. Version two retracted one of my own earlier claims.

Read the piece

How I work

Limits first
Every report says what the data can't answer, before you rely on it.
On your data
On paid work I run the same pipeline on what you already license (Wyscout, StatsBomb, Opta), so the analysis sits on data you own.
Credit where it's due
I build on work by StatsBomb and Hudl, Ted Knutson, Ian Graham, Gradient, Charles Onwuakpa and others, and I say so.

The method, for analysts and hiring teams

I'd like to work on recruitment models and the visual side of how clubs read them. In October 2026 I rebuilt my whole event-data pipeline after finding bugs in the coordinate frame, the match clock and the VAEP formula, and re-ran everything on top of it. My transfer-corridor piece retracted one of its own March claims. That's how I'd work on your data too.

Stack: Python, pandas, scikit-learn, Streamlit, VAEP and xG modelling, data visualisation. Hudl StatsBomb certifications in recruitment and video analysis. Italian and English.

My experience on LinkedIn

For editors and brands

One person who can find the story in the data, write it and draw it, in Italian or English.

Commissioned analysis piece, from €150. Graphics, €25 each.

Ask for a quote
Championship teams rated by a Dixon-Coles xG model, shown as a strip from weakest to strongest
Championship competitiveness from my Dixon-Coles ratings. Personal project.

Not buying yet?

Most clubs buy around transfer windows. In between, The Cutback publishes recruitment work in full: methods, models, and the calls I got wrong.

Get the next piece in your inbox

About

I'm Davide, a football data analyst in Turin. Data visualisation is what I do best; recruitment is where I'm pointing it. I work freelance with Math&Sport on event and aggregated data, and I have an MA in Cultural Anthropology from the University of Turin, which still shapes how I read collective behaviour on the pitch.

I've never worked inside a club, so I publish everything. I'm a Juventus fan and I say so. I use AI to help me build and edit, and I'm open about that too.

Send me the brief

If you're not sure which one you need, send me the problem in two lines. I'll tell you honestly whether I can help, and if I can't.

Sending opens your email app with your answers filled in. I'll reply personally, usually with a couple of questions before we talk.

When do you need it?